-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Miguel ALBUQUERQUE schrieb am 11.04.2006 09:06:
Hello guys,
I got this error when manually updating a system :
ERROR(You:Error parsing patch description.) Error parsing 'Deltas' attribute. Line ' xorg-x11-server-6.8.2-100_100.4.i586.delta.rpm 245406 3ad5216c49cc61665280daa091d520e8 xorg-x11-server-6.8.2-100 1126567701 3e051563544c6ffdf167c19a999566c4' doesn't have form 'filename size md5sum name-edition-release buildtime srcmd5sum seq'.
Is that me or the patch description is corrupted ?
Miguel, I try on every YOU server in germany available now, and I get this response from everywhere. So either the patch or its description are broken. At least, it is not only you ;-), it seems to be YOU :->
Many thanks
Miguel Albuquerque Network Administrator
CODaLIS SA
Chemin de Trèfle-Blanc 18 1228 Plan-Les-Ouates / CH
TEL : +41 22 827 30 80 FAX : +41 22 827 30 33 http://www.codalis.ch
DISCLAIMER - This message is intended for the use of the named person only. The information contained in this E-mail is confidential and any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. This message does not represent a formal commitment by Codalis SA. Codalis SA is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
HTH Werner - -- Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV UFZ Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH, Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: werner.flamme@ufz.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEO10pk33Krq8b42MRAhksAJ4/H9qsgMbvDfcO1587wzJxl/VuuACeJAPD 8yfThC1lLFd1GjmhyuWI2B0= =W+PL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- IMPORTANT - ANTI-DISCLAIMER - This email is not and cannot, by its nature, be confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass across the public Internet, easily readable by any number of system administrators along the way. If you have received this message by mistake, it would be ridiculous for me to tell you not to read it or copy to anyone else, because, let's face it, if it's a message revealing confidential information or that could embarrass me intensely, that's precisely what you'll do. Who wouldn't? Likewise, it is superfluous for me to claim copyright in the contents, because I own that anyway, even if you print out a hard copy or disseminate this message all over the known universe. I don't know why so many corporate mail servers feel impelled to attach a disclaimer to the bottom of every email message saying otherwise. If you don't know either, why not email your corporate lawyers and system administrators and ask them why they insist on contributing so much to the waste of bandwidth? To say nothing of making the presence of your mail on public discussions or mailinglists of explicitly contratictory nature. May as well just delete it, eh? Oh, and this message is probably plagued with viruses as well.