Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-security (226 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-security] Re: Strange links, /usr/bin/[ ?
- From: Ingo Boernig <ingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:51:41 +0200
- Message-id: <424D5FFD.8030908@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
pelibali wrote:
This is a softlink. -> man ln (option -s)
These are hardlinks. Also: man ln
It _is_ the same file ;) Try to use "ls -i" (This shows the inode number, which shows that these files are identical and only once on the disk ;)
Cheers,
Ingo
--
Ingo Börnig <ingo at boernig.de> /"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
ask for phone or snail mail X against HTML email
/ \
GPG-Fingerprint: 2F8B DDFB F2A8 155A 206D 2969 F8FB 3C63 2033 BF32
pelibali wrote:
Hi,
I would have another question in (not so tight) relation to this
topic. While checking files/folders on my SUSE 9.1 system, I realized,
that many times happens, that there are files with the same size and
same md5sum and they are really two separated files. I mean named
differently, but stored still in the same folder. Is there a security
reason or in fact why is this method better and not just link one to
another as e.g. the case is for python-related stuff:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5812 2005-02-05 17:23 /usr/bin/python2.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2005-03-19 23:29 /usr/bin/python ->
python2.3
This is a softlink. -> man ln (option -s)
I would say, it's OK, even that the above files are tiny. But there
are several others as:
package 'automake'
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 220546 2004-11-15 13:04 /usr/bin/automake-1.9
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 220546 2004-11-15 13:04 /usr/bin/automake
or
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 20632 2004-11-15 13:04 /usr/bin/aclocal-1.9
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 20632 2004-11-15 13:04 /usr/bin/aclocal
These are hardlinks. Also: man ln
;) hardlinks too
And additionally for the following two pairs at least 2Mb could be
saved, because they are _big_:
package 'perl'
/usr/bin/perl
/usr/bin/perl5.8.3
/usr/bin/sperl5.8.3
/usr/bin/suidperl
So the brief question is, why is it better to keep two copies of
completely same file?
It _is_ the same file ;) Try to use "ls -i" (This shows the inode number, which shows that these files are identical and only once on the disk ;)
Read a good book about Linux/UNIX administration. You will find some useful and interesting things! ;))
Thank you and have a nice weekend,
Pelibali
Cheers,
Ingo
--
Ingo Börnig <ingo at boernig.de> /"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
ask for phone or snail mail X against HTML email
/ \
GPG-Fingerprint: 2F8B DDFB F2A8 155A 206D 2969 F8FB 3C63 2033 BF32
| < Previous | Next > |