21 Jan
2005
21 Jan
'05
22:55
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:44:03AM +0100, pelibali wrote:
So there was a first round of updates, and also a second one; and these two groups of rpms were build from two different source as well. My question was, that in December 2004, when the updated subversion-viewcvs package appeared via YOU; shouldn't be all of the other subversion-related packages updated again? I mean, that the
Why should all packages be updated again, if only one package was affected by a fix? To waste some extra bandwidth? Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de