14 Jul
2004
14 Jul
'04
04:37
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 08:23 pm, suse@rio.vg wrote:
PS: Mounting /usr read-only would be fine if you only managed one or two servers. When you manage two dozen, it quickly becomes too much of a pain in the ass when you have security patches for those read-only files. Mount /usr remotely on all of them from a single source and patching that is a great theory until you realize that a single problem can wipe out your whole machine room...
Not if you mount your remote /use directly on top of an existing /usr. If you lose your remote, the worst that happens is you fall back to a slightly older local copy. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen