Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-security (409 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-security] bind8 or 9?
- From: Michael Zimmermann <zim@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:55:40 +0200
- Message-id: <200208301256.02936.zim@xxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At Freitag, 30. August 2002 12:31 Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Is anyone able/willing to give a brief opinion about the level of
> security of bind 8 and 9?
No problems with running bind9 (except for an occassional restart
about once or twice a week, which I couldn't yet figure out).
No security problems AFAIK.
Bind should be run chroot anyway IMO.
Greetings
- --
Michael Zimmermann (Vegaa Safety and Security for Internet Services)
Key fingerprint = 1E47 7B99 A9D3 698D 7E35 9BB5 EF6B EEDB 696D 5811
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9b08572vu22ltWBERAqspAJ4rlqgzLY7iyMY2UCBpR62pb2hcBwCfZEny
9tiw6LHPPiUO8bC38SQTDkM=
=nHMf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
At Freitag, 30. August 2002 12:31 Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Is anyone able/willing to give a brief opinion about the level of
> security of bind 8 and 9?
No problems with running bind9 (except for an occassional restart
about once or twice a week, which I couldn't yet figure out).
No security problems AFAIK.
Bind should be run chroot anyway IMO.
Greetings
- --
Michael Zimmermann (Vegaa Safety and Security for Internet Services)
Key fingerprint = 1E47 7B99 A9D3 698D 7E35 9BB5 EF6B EEDB 696D 5811
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9b08572vu22ltWBERAqspAJ4rlqgzLY7iyMY2UCBpR62pb2hcBwCfZEny
9tiw6LHPPiUO8bC38SQTDkM=
=nHMf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |