23 May
2002
23 May
'02
18:06
* Thomas Michael Wanka (Tom@Wanka.at) [020523 03:09]:
to me this is not OT.
As someone else pointed out, unless we're talking about millions of spams it is off topic for a security list.
There is no other solution than having the real addresses in the archives, because that is the way this thing works.
No, that's not the way this thing works as explained earlier. You can can set your header from (i.e., the only one anyone else will ever see) to whatever you want. You can even leave it null and become 'undisclosed-receipients' if you want to. -- -ckm