JW wrote:
an >Roman Drahtmueller wrote: an >> Negative. You need the LSM patch in the kernel for that. I see what I can an >> do to have that one included in the future. Roman,
Do you have any advise for those of us who are wanting to do this _now_, e.g. is there a SuSEified LSM patch alreday produced anywhere -- no matter if it is beta, alpha, or what -- it would help to know of any previous work in this matter.
I don't know if there are problems with SuSE running a vanilla kernel patched with LSM. The system boots with it. As I said before, it's not the LSM patch giving me headaches, the tools which need to be built do. Either you modify SELinux files (e.g. disable PAM support in makefiles in order to compile) or you try to install missing header files, libraries etc. and leave SELinux stuff almost unchanged. I would like to know if there is a problem running a vanilla kernel not patched by SuSE?