My network doesn' seem to miss them :) After re-looking at my SuSEfirewall rules, maybe it's because i have the internal network protection turned off? Have to inspect again the rules generated by SuSEfirewall. Does anyone know of an udp packet generator to test this? It has to work in w2k - my internal network is all w2k. Thanks Carlos
-----Original Message----- From: jfweber@eternal.net [mailto:jfweber@eternal.net] Sent: terça-feira, 17 de Abril de 2001 19:55 To: suse-security@suse.com Subject: Re: Re: [suse-security] Re: Samba on firewall
** Reply to message from Carlos Costa e Silva
on Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:16:23 +0100 ***What are the other ports (135,136,139) used for? ***In here I dont have any denied packets
port 135 is RPC (remote session services locater) port 136 = (profiling services ) port 139 is netbios -SSN ( a session manager for netbios)
I just took that info off a w2k box , you MUST allow those ports open on your internal network , I can't think of any good reason for them to be open on a firewall , esp if you are using Masq functions or proxies ..
I know the windows stuff wont work w/o them , and samba is looking to support windows boxen , no?
j
afterthought ... > ... FILE NOT FOUND. Should I FAKE it? (Y/N)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com