Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-security (240 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
"su"
- From: "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:43:39 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.QNWS_2.0002241842100.8362-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering why the SuSE team chose to use GNU su instead of the
shadow su. I find that the shadow su offers a greater level of
customability, security wise. Is there a problem with it?
Thanks,
__
L. Sassaman
System Administrator | "All of the chaos
Technology Consultant | Makes perfect sense..."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Joe Diffie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
iD8DBQE4tcI0PYrxsgmsCmoRAiAYAJkB5tocalyQe+Hzi4SZ1dmSTCIPnACghUjp
DfSKCdVDUfX3qEEu0Ehnn/I=
=dGiO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering why the SuSE team chose to use GNU su instead of the
shadow su. I find that the shadow su offers a greater level of
customability, security wise. Is there a problem with it?
Thanks,
__
L. Sassaman
System Administrator | "All of the chaos
Technology Consultant | Makes perfect sense..."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Joe Diffie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
iD8DBQE4tcI0PYrxsgmsCmoRAiAYAJkB5tocalyQe+Hzi4SZ1dmSTCIPnACghUjp
DfSKCdVDUfX3qEEu0Ehnn/I=
=dGiO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |