On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:33:49 +0200
Stephan Kulow
On 11.07.2012 14:51, James Tan wrote:
Ping, no comments from anyone?
For the short/immediate term I highly recommend that we go with allowing the bundling of gems in applications.
This ruby community is great in exchanging ideas :)
Greetings, Stephan
Well, what you ideas you expect? For me it is reinventing wheel. It is exactly same for me like discussion if we should link libraries statically or dynamic. I see there same pros&cons. And question is if we want user to get bundled apps from us ( some appliacation is so complex, fragile, that any dependency change can break it ) or if he should download it outside of distribution ( like we do now with bundled libraries, e.b. games from humble bumble, that often contain static libraries ). I see there only small difference, that more ruby library authors ignore backward compatibilty ( just my observation ), but it is not bug difference. So what we should discuss? It is clear decision what we want distribute. Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+owner@opensuse.org