-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/2015 10:15 AM, Klaas Freitag wrote:
On 09.06.2015 14:21, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2015 08:13:59 Michal Hrusecky wrote:
We discussed this topic at not so recent openSUSE Board Face to Face meeting and touched it on oSC 15 during project meeting. Also taking under consideration the responses that were provided to a similar topic approximately 2 years ago, we (in the board) think it would be a good idea to implement something to help with that. Automatically monitor openSUSE Members activity on mailing lists, OBS, bugzilla, maybe more. Remember when we last saw openSUSE Member on any of those channels and if he doesn't show for for example one year, we can send him e-mail asking whether he still wants to be a member with a link to click to create artificial activity for the automat. And if he doesn't click on it in let's say month, we will retire him - he will be moved to openSUSE retired geekos group. If he comes back and want to be member again or if he was retired by accident, he can be made member again by just clicking on the link from the mail or by asking membership committee and they will approve him without any additional questions.
Automatic monitoring of general activity is difficult, error-prone, and can have all kind of unintended social side effects. It would need quite some effort.
I can not believe that we're really discussing "automatic monitoring of activity". The day on that becomes active will be my last in openSUSE. No, we do not wanna do that. We do not want to have a secret service.
A much simpler way would be to just use participation in votes as a criteria. This also would be directly tied to what the membership is about. We could do something like putting everybody who hasn't voted for two consecutive board elections into an emeritus state without voting rights. This would keep the membership with voting rights to the active people.
In KDE e.V. we do it this way for many years and it works quite well.
Yes, the KDE e.V. rule is good.
Sorry I don't get it, can you please explain your very strong opposition to "monitoring of activity" vs. "monitoring of voting activity". - From my perspective one is being "monitored", but obviously there is a very clear and strong distinction for you between the two types of monitoring. I'd like to understand that distinction. Thank you, Robert - -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Public Cloud Architect LINUX rjschwei@suse.com IRC: robjo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVdvamAAoJEE4FgL32d2UkJyUH+wVXyv71X4LV8/swJ3d8Saqj f8zGnrEvG/Ap0BLJaI2u3/2XtLsQKlPrFdEU5U3fKwyeJpKX+jkVnS9hODvE6GZk m8t6BkBtRazdUIvoSivFq46J2FThBqQg/5ifP1dcpimsColxmXOPqQjz+vbwWlOz e4u5GoM5TI22EdJK5j3AkR1w8STQaT/8CmwzpkMiQ2h24NinSWoR8DGmKV9RrkUX GXfHAv6KHcSIxzlg1pmMGv4BrmEkAkfOwEFCOu7xcoW2q2Jv/tpOkhCLsYxwrFEM vyD7LRBx2zQiVSbICGzwcg8xRBaRkuvfzoKa7EJIpgDEF/o9i5IKm59OhK1ufPc= =wV7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org