On 11/12/13 13:10, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
just a little suggestion, when I was discussing the Karma idea during the GSoC the conclusion we came up with was to not have one overall karma for everything as it is hard to compare/weight organizing presence on event with fixing the bugs. So the think we did was to collect separate karma for marketing, development or documentation. Advantage of that is that you also clearly see, what are people most active/good at.
I believe that this is still a good idea as if we want to make it in use somewhere, being superambasador still doesn't say much about being good developer and vice versa.
I don't see karma as a good metric of being a developer or an event organiser anyway - isn't the idea of karma to give recognition for contributions and thereby motivation to contributors? To use the Stackoverflow example, you can earn 100s of points answering questions about openSUSE but it doesn't say anything about your LISP skills, it just shows you are a contributor of useful answers. Will -- Will Stephenson SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org