On Tue, Oct 9, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:07:08AM -0700, ar16@imapmail.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012, at 06:55 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Bugzilla has a clear notion: developer sets from ASSIGNED to RESOLVED, reporter sets it to VERIFIED or REOPENED.
I was not aware of the verified status and that the reporter has to set it. :-?
Very few are aware of it or use it.
Then perhaps that could be addressed at the project/developer level -- mandated either by policy or automation.
Currently, it's not done so consistently, if at all -- My current examples of that "clear notion" of a workflow NOT working as ideally intended include:
What do you think is the issue here? It is still debugging.
Hmm. What do you think the issue is here? That no 12.2 update was created yet?
Only part missing was that I did not add the bnc# to the mdadm update, sorry.
I simply provided all three examples in response to coolo's specific comments re: bugzilla's workflow. In all three cases the bugs were NOT set to "RESOLVED" by the dev, but rather to CLOSED/FIXED prior to, as OP, my being able to legitimately test, and VERIFY. So I REOPENED. I *specifically* called out in my OP that they're examples of workflow, NOT that I have an "issue" or criticism that was done on the bugs. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org