On 08.10.2012 19:14, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012-10-08 09:20 (GMT-0700) ar16@imapmail.org composed:
Reopening is certainly an option.
agree
Reopening is not always well received.
agree
The noise created by the open/close/reopen 'dance', and hunting for bug-specific information outside of the bug, simply wastes everybody's time, and, imo, discourages participation/contribution.
AGREE
I'd like to propose (at least for some discussion) that bug process/workflow be changed to require the inclusion/posting of target package info, and an OP-verification step.
I'd rather simply that bugs not be marked fixed until packages including their fixes appear on all relevant repos.
And who is going to volunteer to do the bugzilla closing? You can't seriously expect the developer to fix bugs *and* watch the repos all the time. Bugzilla has a clear notion: developer sets from ASSIGNED to RESOLVED, reporter sets it to VERIFIED or REOPENED. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org