Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (382 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-project] Re: Improving the bug management lifecycle/process
- From: Jim Henderson <hendersj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <jp0u0m$g1d$2@dough.gmane.org>
On Wed, 16 May 2012 20:38:39 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
No, but if it's fixed in factory, then the question becomes about
backporting the fix and/or properly identifying that it has been fixed in
factory.
It's not a productive use of a developer's time to fix something that's
already been fixed. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jim Henderson wrote:
But I don't think it's as simple as telling the reporter "try the
version in factory" because I /think/ it's possible that pulling a
single package in from factory might well cause additional
libraries/dependencies to be brought in as well that /may/ break other
things (true statement? Can someone confirm?)
We should most certainly not be recommending or using Factory to users
as a part of resolving a bug.
No, but if it's fixed in factory, then the question becomes about
backporting the fix and/or properly identifying that it has been fixed in
factory.
It's not a productive use of a developer's time to fix something that's
already been fixed. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |