Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (168 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] Including or not Java binaries in OBS
  • From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:58:21 +0200
  • Message-id: <4F916B7D.4050505@suse.de>
Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
On 04/20/2012 01:58 PM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Pascal Bleser wrote:
[...]
- how likely is it that we are going to patch an upstream java
library or application ourselves, rather than updating it to
an upstream release that fixes the issue ?
* very few in this project are fluent with java
* is it an issue to push a newer version to fix rather than
backporting changes/patches for those packages ?
Well, just recently we had the case where a fix was only a few lines
but the package couldn't be rebuilt from java source and upstream
only offered a major version update. That sucks. It's embarrassing
if a package is flagged as free software but you can't actually fix
it. If at all exceptions should be granted only on a case by case
basis after thorough review. Also such packages should not be put in
the oss tree.

How about if we create a new tree for those Java applications? I think
we should not use NonFree since this would confuse users, that they
use non free software.

There is no usable source, you can't fix bugs in the code yourself
and you probably don't even know what license that random dump of
bundled jars has. Calling it non-free is the closest match.

cu
Ludwig

--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >