Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (213 mails)

["Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-03-28 06:50, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:17:25 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
>
> > Yes, it all has to be part of this "reboot."  But the main gist of what
> > I'm pointing out is that if we are going this route, our delay is going
> > to be about 2 years from now before we start inactivating anyone and I
> > think that kind of defies the whole intent in the first place.
>
> Yep, and it was pointed out to me that Thomas' post already covered that 
> option (which I missed), and I noted as well on a re-read that he also 
> included decoupling 'benefits' from 'membership', which I think sums it 
> up nicely.

Then I don't see the advantage of doing this at all. The only thing a
member loses if he doesn't vote in the elections is the ability to vote on
other votes. Why? Maybe he doesn't want to vote on the elections but wants
to vote on other issues.

Or are we counting all votes, if he doesn't participate on any vote then he
can not vote? Isin't that redundant? Why count it at all, if the moment he
votes on something he is reinstated by definition as "active"?

A loss of time, or I haven't understood it.

- -- 
Cheers / Saludos,

                Carlos E. R.
                (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9yy4YACgkQIvFNjefEBxqF5gCg1+wivEa24jQkzPL/5W2qNQn7
V1gAnR2pnzCOTlaFuA3pE6gsb6FSz940
=+94Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx