On 03/12/2012 12:01 PM, Pascal Bleser wrote:
On 2012-03-12 08:39:32 (+0100), jdd
wrote: Le 12/03/2012 06:00, Bryen M Yunashko a écrit :
It's hard work, but I really think we should be thinking along the lines of multiple-mediums here.
yes; having gateways wouls be great. But this also mean no realtime decision.
No, hard work means it won't be done. It's that simple.
And removing "realtime decision" means there is no point to use IRC then. Just use the mailing-lists.
we could easily agree on a short delay, allowing to port the theme from IRC to mailing list, forum, planet... and asking for an answer on connect, for example.
Making connect work better would be a great step ahead
No tools will solve this. And it won't be connect, nor the forums, and the MLs probably won't ever achieve the same level of productivity either.
If you want to influence the project, it's at the very least on the MLs, but IRC works a lot better. And that's very unlikely to change in a near future.
As said in another post, that's how most if not all other Linux distribution projects do it too.
I'm not saying "this is how it must be", I'm just saying "this is how it is", at least based on my experience.
cheers
+1 Personally I am not ready to drop the IRC meeting for it's interactivity and IRC is the dominant medium for developers IME. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org