Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (194 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] [RFC] - Attempt to build open SLES-based distro
- From: Markus Slopianka <markus.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:06:00 +0200
- Message-id: <201109271206.00102.markus.s@kdemail.net>
open-slx is planning an SLE 12 clone with the completely retarded name Balsam
Enterprise,
although I don't know if they plan that with community participation.
On Dienstag 27 September 2011 11:29:17 Michael Kromer wrote:
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Enterprise,
although I don't know if they plan that with community participation.
On Dienstag 27 September 2011 11:29:17 Michael Kromer wrote:
Hello community,--
this mail is the result of years of continuous development in my (corporate
and private) environment as engineer favoring SUSE, and I kindly invite
anyone to send thoughts, comments and ideas regarding this mail. I see
this topic "as in progress" and if there aren't any ultimately bad reasons
why not to do so, I will continue and support this as long as I can.
- Disclaimer: This is all IMHO ;) -
My idea is to build a SLES binary-compatible distribution completely
supported by the community (and optionally supported by companies which
are willing to do so) - most of you will probably see lots of similarities
with CentOS in this way - And in fact: This is exactly what I intend it to
be.
Why?
- SLES is one of two key players in the major distribution league. RH has
CentOS, and whereever you see "respins" like for appliances, they use
CentOS (or maybe some debian/ubuntu/knoppix-stuff) - no SUSE. Examples:
Trixbox, ESVA, and _lots_ of projects in which I've been involved in
development however its not officially communicated as CentOS.
- SUSE is the best Distro in terms of packaging and distribution technology
(OBS), has a huge community-base and uses technology which IMHO is
unmatched for various reasons such as KIWI (thx to Marcus Schaefer ;)).
- openSUSE is a "moving target" in terms of its faster release cycle and it
in fact is a problem that older releases disappear from the mirrors pretty
soon. (I would not change anything here) - But: This doesn't really allow
you a "LTS"-like behaviour if things change so fast.
- SUSE has a great community of highly motivated and skilled guys (and
gals) ;) - lots of developments in openSUSE find their way right into
SLES, approved and tested by SUSE engineers.
What I can and will provide:
- I'm just building up a rack to provide various build nodes. Target arch's
include: x86, x86_64, sparc64, ia64, ppc64. Most of the parts are already
available, but since I'm currently moving and I need to get a stable
permanent internet connection this could take up to 2 months. So this
enables us right from scratch to set up a parallel OBS for the intial
build setup. Official OBS could always be used as soon as we have reached
a "staging" level where we can provide a base set of packages.
- I will provide anyone with an account and try to build a full
"infrastructure" which then should also should get the transition to
"community-controlled" behaviour.
For all (eventually) upcoming questions:
- Yes, I do know about openSUSE Evergreen, but it lacks some points I've
mentioned above like "Enterprise Features", 1-on-1-("binary")compatibility
with SLES and the great quality work by SUSE to get SLES certified by
OEM's etc. - and no one really points its OBS tree to build against
Evergreen, it points it to major channels like SLES11, SLES11SP1, oS11.4,
etc.
- No, I do not want to work "against" SUSE or anything like that. The
complete opposite is the case: Without SUSE this would not work well. In
fact I really think SUSE also can profit from a community base around the
SLES packages. Take a look at CentOS - Does it really hurt RHEL? I don't
think so, at least not to a major extent. Lets get the facts straight: If
you are in a corporate environment you _will_ (or at least you _should_)
buy a SLES. Reasons: Support, Updates, Faster upstream process, tracking,
direct contact, etc. But: If you want to build a steady home system which
you do not want to upgrade less than every year in a major way or you
might want to build a distro fork for special purpose (like for system
integrators, etc.) you (probably) wouldn't want to go with the fully blown
SLES.
- Yes, I see this as lots of work. Please let me know if you are willing to
help. ;)
Can't await reading your comments.
Cheers,
- mike
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |