Le 16/06/2011 10:14, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer:
What I _want_ is that I have a working 12.1 without regressions caused by the fact we switched init. If that doesn't work I expect that a switch is flipped before the release to go back to what we had. I haven't heard other comments so I just expect this is how it will be done. This is exactly what Frederic proposed from the start - first we prepare, then we test and then we switch.
yes the question is who decide to switch And those that didn't test, have no right to
protest after we switched - IMO.
wrong. Not anybody can test anything and the test result can be appreciated by many. I'm really sure coolo do not test all and his opinion have a major value. of course *advice of involved people have maximum value* but others may have also usefull arguments and ideas. by the way, on the past it's obviously not always the developpers that had the last word but comercials (not always to the better). I know for sure that not all the programms in openSUSE have been tested (some don't even install) the result is that this discussion is *not* unusefull. It shows that we have some problems that may be didn't appear before but do now than the community is taking more importance. That's why the distribution team should be augmented. May be we should ask for volunteers? How does it work? what is exactly the task? Is it possible to segment this task (open a new thread). As a community we have to value any discussion, any member (at least! any user in fine) and try to make our workflow better at any time (OK, this is sometime boring and time consuming) jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://pizzanetti.fr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org