Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (202 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] Re: [opensuse-factory] The road to systemd for openSUSE 12.1
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:34:57 +0200
  • Message-id: <itau0h$onh$1@saturn.local.net>
Jim Henderson wrote:

It's useful to discuss things to a point, but a decision needs to be
made (regardless of the topic) and we need to move on to the next
thing. Trying to come to a group consensus is a useful decision making
process, but not something that should be employed for every single
decision being made - the community can't micromanage every aspect of
the project - that's part of the reason we elected a leadership team
in the project.

I was not aware that we had elected a leadership team.

With regards to the topic under discussion, maybe someone could (if it
hasn't already been done) post a high-level comparison of the two
components and identify what a migration path would look like to get
from sysvinit to systemd.

I think that is what part of what we are asking.
Overall, switching to systemd sounds like a good idea to me, although I
don't think we should make it default in 12.1. systemd comes with
certain new features (e.g. cgroup support) which will no doubt be
attractive to some more than others. Let the keen, early adopters iron
out whatever wrinkles might be left after Factory, then let the regular
user get a system (in 12.2) that "just works".

If we are going to switch, we need to provide a migration path for
those who have created custom init scripts.

systemd is, as far as my own tests have shown, virtually sysvinit
compatible, i.e. custom init scripts will quite likely continue to
work.


--
Per Jessen, Zürich (24.2°C)

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
Follow Ups