On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 19:33 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I will say that from the "discussion" here that I feel (I have sufficient lack of expertise to do other than "feel") systemd is the future. I agree, but the discussion (as I see it) has been more about whether to push it into to being the default when it being the default is not really needed nor warranted. (as far as the facts have been presented to us).
I think it should become the default; because maintaining two stacks is just wasted effort [systemd systems and non-systemd systems]. Make a change and make it clean and sharp. If dynamic workstation / laptops require it [or it at least makes life easier] then just deploy it as the default; servers don't much care and sys-admins will adapt. And there are advantages to systemd for servers as described in the systemd-for-admins PDF.
My position is to push back until our integration or systemd has received sufficient testing. It is _easy_ to test and measure for anyone who boots regularly.
There is nobody arguing for including it prior to "sufficient testing". -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org