Am 14.06.2011 12:16, schrieb Michal Vyskocil:
first of all - I wrote only about fact it's good to have systemd in **Factory** enabled by default earlier than later. This will give us more time for testing and on the end we will have the hard facts to decide if it will make a sense enable it by default on 11.2 or not. This is similar to Linus's talk is cheap approach.
Of course all people involved in systemd hopes it will be default in 11.2 - it does not make a sense to work on a project, when you don't trust it will be succesfull, right?
For the rest, you wrote "there are just several statements by SUSE employees". Please be aware of that despite the part behind @ in our email, we are just the part of community like any other. At least me is telling only my POW here, but I'm sure that the rest of colleagues are doing the same.
With 11.2 you mean 12.1, right? Factory for 11.2 is a bit out of date I think :D Why not splitting Factory here? There´s the factory-tested tree, right? Why not using systemd in Factory, and the old start environment in factory-tested? thanks -- Kim Leyendecker (kdl@k-dl.de.vu) openSUSE Ambassador / openSUSE Wiki Team DE HAVE A LOT OF FUN! http://www.opensuse.org | http://www.suse.de Have you tried SUSE Studio? Need to create a Live CD, an app you want to package and distribute , or create your own linux distro. Give SUSE Studio a try. www.susestudio.com. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org