Le 09/05/2011 20:13, Greg KH a écrit :
So you are saying that we should not post anything and just hope to address it _after_ the fact? That's not good.
not at all. just the contrary. we have to define what it forgiven (harassment, if you keep only this word, is extremely difficult to prove in court, let alone in an OSC), but also say how we will make the rule enforced (read again my last post, thanks) please, take example of images: there are two ways to cope with offending images: white list of black list. "only official opensUSE images will be authorized" is pretty hard, but there no discussions; "please do not use any sexy (male or female) image" is softer, but much more difficult to sort with. Many advertisement campaign that we see in any street are inappropriate? In such case, we can have soft rules, if and only if one people (or a small group of people) is given the right to decide. You can't say "is inapropriate what is seen as inapropriate", because somebody have to arbiter! don't se have already "guiding principles"? (and some peoples don't like this) jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://www.youtube.com/user/jdddodinorg http://jdd.blip.tv/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org