Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (539 mails)

[Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 19:29 +0100, C a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 19:02, jdd wrote:
> > Le 15/03/2011 17:56, Jim Henderson a écrit :
> >
> >
> > > Same here, I don't see a compelling reason to change, maybe just a
> > > compelling reason to define what constitutes a major version number
> > > increase.
> >
> > you see... even you don't see that there are no major/minor difference...
>
> Ha, and yet people still think that the openSUSE dot zero release is
> "bad" and one to shy away from.  If anything comes of this discussion,
> I really hope it finds a way to squash that particular myth once and
> for all...

Funny, at Mandriva, we had the exact same myths regarding .0 and .1
release (2009.0 vs 2009.1) : people were sure there were less bugs in .1
vs .0, even if there was the exact same amount of breakag^Wfeatures for
each new release.

I guess the only way to drop this feeling would be to use the "fedora"
way (because our release schedule of 8 months would cause "strange"
release number if using ubuntu scheme).

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Novell

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx