On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:25:48 +0900, Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Jim Henderson wrote:
I think what Henne is trying to say is that there's a point at which you reach diminishing returns when it comes to eliminating risk.
You (or someone) say that it's 99.9% risk-free, so now you're trying to address the 0.1% risk that you perceive as remaining.
But there comes a point where it doesn't really make sense to continue trying to reduce the risk because the effort to do so takes increasingly more and more time to effect any difference.
If we just need to focus whether we can be sued or not, I agree with you.
However, if we focus whether we are really compliant or not, we need to be more deliberate.
That makes more sense to me, thanks for the clarification. Basically, you just want to/need to do your due diligence, and that's what you're trying to do here. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org