Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (280 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] License and copyright issues that openSUSE Weekly News team are coming up against now
- From: "pistazienfresser (see profile)" <pistazienfresser@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:56:10 +0100
- Message-id: <4D5A85FA.8050609@gmx.de>
Am 15/02/11 14:10, schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
And I would guess in this thread are many aspects mixed together
(outspoken and hidden; technical, social, historical, personal, legal).
I know that probably all is connected and maybe one caused each other.
But my idea would be that we would try to separate the problems a bit
from each other (in different threads?).
E.G:
Against the fear/threat of being (with or without effort) sued for
making the openSUSE Weekly News I would have those points in mind:
- Asking the original authors
- No full repetition of hole articles nor big parts of them
- More indirect citing (telling in the own words)
- ?Maybe a bit more concentration on issues of openSUSE?
- Asking others what they think about the way that the openSUSE Weekly
News are made.
- Protection for the ones that give effort to the openSUSE community
The least point is in my view at least worth a different thread.
Maybe as an part of the (planned?) discussion about possible goals of
the unborn openSUSE foundation/legal person for the community?
Compare:
Henne on
http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation with
http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation/Topics
Martin
(pistazienfresser)
--
- Martin Seidler
- openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,+1
On 15.02.2011 12:44, jdd wrote:
Le 15/02/2011 12:07, Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
guys when are you going to realize that the 0,01% your are trying to
solve are not worth all this effort? :)
free software world also give much value to such things (sometime too
much IMHO)
That's why it's okay to talk about the licensing of the content on our
web-pages. But it's rather pointless to talk about re-licensing of
content aggregated on the planet or cited in the weekly newsletter...
Henne
And I would guess in this thread are many aspects mixed together
(outspoken and hidden; technical, social, historical, personal, legal).
I know that probably all is connected and maybe one caused each other.
But my idea would be that we would try to separate the problems a bit
from each other (in different threads?).
E.G:
Against the fear/threat of being (with or without effort) sued for
making the openSUSE Weekly News I would have those points in mind:
- Asking the original authors
- No full repetition of hole articles nor big parts of them
- More indirect citing (telling in the own words)
- ?Maybe a bit more concentration on issues of openSUSE?
- Asking others what they think about the way that the openSUSE Weekly
News are made.
- Protection for the ones that give effort to the openSUSE community
The least point is in my view at least worth a different thread.
Maybe as an part of the (planned?) discussion about possible goals of
the unborn openSUSE foundation/legal person for the community?
Compare:
Henne on
http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation with
http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation/Topics
By-laws
* Objective of the Foundation
o Moderator: henne
o Status : Topic is now open for mailing list discussions
o Results :
Martin
(pistazienfresser)
--
- Martin Seidler
- openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |