Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (479 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Re: Public statement (...) how to prevent such discussion...
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:37:56 +0100
- Message-id: <ihcqr4$jmn$1@saturn.local.net>
Jim Henderson wrote:
I would have to go and read up on them, but for now, they're only
_guiding_ me.
Let's not get into that, please. The openSUSE community is (or hopes to
be) far too widespread for any hard and fast rules to be of much use.
IMHO, the reason they're guiding principles is that very few people or
organisations, if any, are arrogant/stupid enough to attempt to lay
down hard and fast rules that apply to the entire world. The EU tries
to work with 27 different countries/cultures, and is having trouble
with that. There are others - the ICC and such, but despite an awful
lot of effort, they're struggling.
To indicate intent and direction.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-2.5°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
As I've watched this discussion unfold, fold, refold, and be
multilated multiple times, it's occurred to me on more than one
occasion that the guiding principles are something that many people
seem to agree to in order to become a member, but they don't actually
follow them.
I would have to go and read up on them, but for now, they're only
_guiding_ me.
One of the decisions that I think the current members and the board
need to consider is whether or not that requirement (assuming I'm
remembering correctly) makes sense, and if it does, then following
them does become a criteria for whether or not someone remains a
member.
Let's not get into that, please. The openSUSE community is (or hopes to
be) far too widespread for any hard and fast rules to be of much use.
If someone who is a member constantly violates the guiding principles,
then that says to me that the only reason they agreed to them was to
become a member, and not because they actually think there's any
meaning.
IMHO, the reason they're guiding principles is that very few people or
organisations, if any, are arrogant/stupid enough to attempt to lay
down hard and fast rules that apply to the entire world. The EU tries
to work with 27 different countries/cultures, and is having trouble
with that. There are others - the ICC and such, but despite an awful
lot of effort, they're struggling.
But if there's no meaning to agreeing to those principles, then why
have them?
To indicate intent and direction.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-2.5°C)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |