On 17/01/2011 21:21, jdd wrote:
Le 17/01/2011 10:25, Basil Chupin a écrit :
WEll, I don't quite agree with this because the votes belong to him and therefore they are at his disposal to do what he wants to do with them. new thing. Who said that?
votes are votes and belongs to nobody.
To follow your logic, any vote cast for any person in this election - and let's restrict this debate to THIS election, OK? - does not belong to any of the people for whom the votes were cast. So, if I cast cast a vote for Henne, that vote does not belong to him and therefore the vote cannot be directed towards his nomination for the position on the board. Right? This is what you are saying. Who then owns that vote and therefore has the authority to decide to whom that vote should be allocated?
They can be used following the rules adopted before the vote, nothing else. If there is no rule, there is no use. Point.
jdd
"Okey-dokey", as Anthony Hopkins said in the fillum, "Hannibal", but as there are no rules then there is also nothing to say that what has been put forward is wrong and cannot be applied in the current circumstances. BC -- "To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge." Confucius -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org