On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:22 +0100, Karsten König wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 15:49:11 schrieb Patrick Shanahan Quite the opposite, I am sure the board made clear what the outcome of the continous violations would be, that's also what Pascal wrote in his mail. The boards decission has the taste of a non-public trial where the boards decission is a final verdict, but usually a person has the right for public hearing in an independent trial.
So why have a board if they can't make final decisions. +1 the board having final authority, because otherwise nobody does.
(far fetched but anyways: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_a_fair_trial )
Seriously? Attaching a legal right to membership in an Open Source project? That is, IMO, just ridiculous. You agreed to terms when you became a member, violation of those terms [the arbiter of which is the board] results in non-membership. Clear and simple. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org