Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (479 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Public statement from the Board on the removal of a member
- From: Karsten König <remur@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:43:35 +0100
- Message-id: <201101141543.35547.remur@gmx.net>
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 15:21:24 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
No, I think the removed person should have a right to defend itself in public
after the affected parties are informed of the verdict, he doesn't have to
though.
I fear I don't understand, I tried combining the wish of privacy with the
transparency of an open government.
Regards,
Karsten
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
* Karsten König <remur@xxxxxxx> [01-14-11 08:59]:
Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 01:24:32 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
6) Unfortunately, only removing the membership status wouldn't have
changed anything in this case, as the disruptive and poisonous
behaviour was not seen exclusively in situations where membership
plays a role. The Board members were (and still are) convinced that we
had to remove the person from the project altogether to resolve this
issue.
If the offender feels mistreated does he/she have a chance to voice
his/her opinion about the matter to the community? Community preferbly
as in opensuse- project mailinglist.
Improbable as the person was completely remove, ie: from mailing lists,
irc...
That way we can safely trust the judgement of the board until the person
can bring up opposite proof.
To me this even sounds pretty good as a rule of thumb in case this
happens again:
A note to -project that the board was forced to remove a member from the
project due to violations of the guidelines and he himself is free to
speak up if he feels wronged. Otherwise any communication between the
affected parties is to be done in private.
The original post on this subject stated that numerous efforts were made
to achieve compliance with the GPs w/o success. Doesn't this meet with
your suggestion?
No, I think the removed person should have a right to defend itself in public
after the affected parties are informed of the verdict, he doesn't have to
though.
That way privacy is respected and no member can be silenced by the board
without note.
The notation appears to be an afterthought.
I fear I don't understand, I tried combining the wish of privacy with the
transparency of an open government.
Regards,
Karsten
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |