On 2011-01-14T16:08:06, Satoru Matsumoto
Stephan Kleine wrote:
If that is too much to ask for then please kick me out as well since I don't want to be a part of this.
Please be easy and have another cup of tea. ;-)
(As privacy is pretty sensitive on this matter, please contact the board directly (board@opensuse.org) if you have further questions or need clarification, instead of discussing it in public.) you can ask board directly what was the problem actually. As far as I understand, both Sankar and Helen (and also board) are just thinking
I can understand what you mean to say. But as Pascal mentioned in the top post of this thread, that it isn't good to reveal things in detail on *google searchable public* place. Once you will ask board directly, you'll be explained why they think that shouldn't be mentioned in public.
Sorry, I disagree as well. I did not follow the incident, and here we are asked to support and understand a rather far reaching decision of the openSUSE board: the first eviction of a member due to a guiding principle violation. In my opinion, the seriousness of the situation warrants a summary description of what actually happened. I don't want names or a recounting of history, but assuming it is public, referencing the offensive thread may be easiest. At the very least, which guiding principles were violated, and how was that violation determined? And, sorry, you're telling us a "member" has been evicted. Are we supposed to enumerate all to find out whom? Victim's privacy is all well, but we have a right to know who has been banned. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org