Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (422 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] Packman for Tumbleweed (was: Announcing openSUSE Tumbleweed project)
  • From: Guido Berhoerster <gber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:34:44 +0100
  • Message-id: <20101204103444.GA18279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-04 11:15]:
On 2010-12-04 10:46:23 (+0100), Detlef Reichelt <detlef@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:19:55 +0100
schrieb Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I personally agree that packages that could also be on
build.opensuse.org should go there instead of being in the Packman
repository but, unfortunately, not everyone in the Packman team
agrees.

because i don't want to split my packages in thousand repos on OBS.
An example:
I stopped building claws-mail on PackMan because it is in Gnome/Apps.
After that i get many mails why i don't build it on PM anymore: "it was
nice to have that in PM-Repo so it could be installed without add more
repos...."

I agree, there are lots of packages that we have or used to have in
Packman for historical reasons, in the sense that we were already
packaging them there before the openSUSE Build Service even existed (or
had those packages). Let's not forget that Packman was already around at
S.u.S.E. Linux times :)

The thing is though that there are at least as many people who complain
that, with Packman, they do not only get the multimedia packages (codecs
and many applications), but also updates for lots and lots of other
stuff, and they don't want that.

That could be solved technically by splitting Packman into two
repositories, one with packages which cannot be included into
openSUSE for legal reasons and one with everything else (and that
sort of exists already for Factory).

--
Guido Berhoerster
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >