Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (349 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Strategy Discussion: Status quo strategy proposal
  • From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:57:37 +0200
  • Message-id: <i4ghrh$m46$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
jdd wrote:

Le 18/08/2010 11:27, Per Jessen a écrit :

I think the really important thing is to accurately define what we
mean when we say "support". For instance, does "not supported" equal
"will not work"? As we know, no it doesn't, nor does it mean that a
bug reported on old hardware will not be looked at. IMHO, it's
perfectly acceptable to adjust the minimum requirements, but that is
not the same as explicitly excluding "support" for hardware from
before 200x.


The strategy discussion was started assuming we don't have the
ressources to do all and every thing

Which is certainly true.

My feeling is than we have to leave alone some old hardware. I know
there are many on the wild (I just use a at least 5 years old
computer), but these are usually very difficult to use with recent
distro and, by the way, don't need them.

My experience is quite the opposite. So far I have only had minor
issues in running openSUSE 10 and 11 on older HP Proliants (up to 10
years).

Why Change distro on old hardware?

It doesn't have to be a change, it could be a new install. The other
day I bought 10 second-hand HP Proliants all from around 2004-2005.

That's said, it's true on desktop/server (that is all but laptop) it's
not easy to give a date, given many component can be changed anytime.

So it's Ok to speak about power. For example, it's pretty difficult to
run modern distro on 486...

Really only because openSUSE is built for i586 - otherwise there is no
problem.



--
Per Jessen, Zürich (18.9°C)

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups