Andreas Jaeger wrote:
So, because of my pain points, I'd like to have a good versioning scheme. Currently we have *no scheme*: We use major.minor without any meaning besides marketing. major gets increased whenever somebody feels like it but there's no documented way of increasing it.
I know this perhaps just me being picky with the words, but we _do_ have a versioning scheme, and it's even well-defined - our problem is that we aren't using it. Personally and probably mostly because of habit, I favour the major.minor system, but I'm not sure it's really very well suited for a project like openSUSE whose core ingrediences come from other projects. A major.minor scheme makes little sense unless it comes with solid planning. This is the kind of release planning where we would know the rough outline+contents+timeline of 12.0 by the time 11.1 is released. Or something along those lines, I'm sure you get the idea. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (24.6°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org