On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Per Jessen <per@opensuse.org> wrote:
Michael Loeffler wrote:
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 15:41:43 Peter Nikolic wrote:
What exactly is wrong with the current system IS this yet another change for the sake of change or does someone have a rock solid reason for changing what seems to work very well for Opensuse note We are NOT Ubuntu we are NOT Fedora we are NOT Debian .
My vote is we stay exactly as we are now and don't wreak a system that works just because someone fancies mucking things up for something to do / get their name mentioned ..
+1, I still don't see what's wrong with the current scheme nor real benefits from a new scheme. M
+1. What would be nice would be to add some real meaning to the major.minor number. And to stick to it.
Ah..., so we could stick with 11.x until KDE 5 comes out! I really think that is bad idea, so I'm going to ignore the technology side of it. The only other driver I could think of is to bump to 12.0 when the new strategy comes out. (That's part of what's driving this discussion anyway.) Stick with 12.x for say 3 years, and then do a strategy revision and bump to 13.0. Repeat every 3 years or so. It has the benefit of putting strategy and strategy revision on people's minds. It also helps people realize when they are having strategy discussions that they should be looking years out, not just a release or two. As to the comment on the wiki that SLES numbers are too easily confused with openSUSE version numbers, I'm not sure that's an openSUSE issue per se. Who's impacted by the confusion. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org