Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (930 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] Members, application and voting
  • From: "Bryen M. Yunashko" <suserocks@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:43:20 -0500
  • Message-id: <1277228600.4616.1033.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 19:23 +0200, Oddball wrote:
Bryen M. Yunashko schreef:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:03 +0200, DenverD wrote:

Pascal Bleser wrote:

One thing I would definitely _not_ agree with, though, is to lower the
bar.
That would be unfair, and it's pointless to target a large number of
members
just for the sake of it if that membership doesn't reflect anything.


thanks for your enlightening answer

if i wrote "lower the bar" it was a mistake, i agree that numbers for
the sake of numbers is not what we need (ask the forum guys how much i
kick when they wanna count 40K+ members, when everyone knows a big
percentage of those posters come once, get an answer and are never
heard from again, ever)..

i say "lower the bar" but instead was asking if "the bar" is in an
established (ie written) guideline..

dd


I can see where they come up with a number like "40K+ members" and
people do interpret the term "member" quite differently. In my opinion,
in its most generic form, everyone is a member of the community of
openSUSE that ranges from actual contributions down to even just users.

There has long been a loose debate about the term "Member" for our
membership roster. And we've never really come up with a truly better
and definitive term. Membership means different things to different
projects. If you're a member of openSUSE or a member of GNOME
Foundation, it means you've demonstrated real contributions to the
project. If you're a member of Linux Foundation, it means you paid $99
for membership dues.

And it has always pained me to have to reject those who apply for
membership and say "I am applying because I want to contribute" because
they haven't figured out yet that you don't have to be an openSUSE
member in order to be a community member and thus contribute. (See how
I used member in two different contexts within our Project?)

So for us, we have two real challenges: 1) Keep the term "Member" or
come up with something better? We're always open to suggestions. and
2) Turn up the volume on Henne's beloved "Just do it!" mantra and get
people to really get it into their heads that if you want to contribute,
just do it. You do not need our approval of membership to be a
contributor. And if you find an obstacle that prevents you from
contributing let us know. But membership in and of itself is in no way
an obstacle to contribution.

Bryen M Yunashko
openSUSE Board Member


Maybe something else could come to existence:
People contribute all they can, in their way, and they get noticed, like
somebody approached me by mail, and asked me if i wanted to have a boxed
edition of 11.1, and what my size was... i had to fill in the needed
data.. after some time a box came... i had ordered nothing.. and than i
saw it! Beautifull, a nice T-Shirt and a surprise, a Led-flashlight was
added with the boxed edition, this was so nice, and felt realy good! To
be appreciated!

People could be asked to become a member, which is quite an honour than...
It feels good to belong, to do something that has any use..
That is a whole lot different from applying with a chance to be
rejected, because that realy sucks..

--

Enjoy your time around,


Oddball, aka M9.

Yes, agreed. And we do. At least I know several of us who do. I have
monitored the IRC channels and whenever I see someone doing some good
continued support work, I ask them to consider signing up for
membership.

Admittedly, we do not do this as a formal action and we should be even
*MORE* proactive in doing that. Recruitment of membership is just as
important as simply having something there for people to apply on their
own.

Bryen

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread