Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (930 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Re: openSUSE Strategy Discussion: another proposal
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:06:40 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1006212049590.18183@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Monday 2010-06-21 20:45, Jim Henderson wrote:
Historically, I think "contributor" has had a connotation of
"developer", but our membership is made up of more than just coders.
The intended contributor: coders, documenters, designers, that sort of
contributors -- literally *creators*. That exempts forum talkers, unless
they can match to the creativity requirement.
That does remove a fairly substantial part of the community, then - which
is why "member" is an additional distinction, as someone else said
(Patrick, I think), a member is an "interested party", which is broader
than "contributor" (though I would hope it's inclusive of the
contributors).
At first I thought contributors should have a say (rather than
Registered Members™).
I'm gonna take that classification for a spin.
Looking at Debian, I am not really interested in that, nor do I
consider myself a member of any of its groups, subsequently I am not
a DD. Yet, I seem to contribute to it resp. its packages, though I
don't think I should be eligible for any decision making such as on
the DD level.
What class am I thus in?
--
# May contain nuts. June too.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |