Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (930 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Alternative strategy proposal: openSUSE - the Linux distribution platform
- From: <tuukka.pasanen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:56:17 +0300
- Message-id: <fdebe8edf744e95a615a0085cb89423d@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:45:23 +0200, Guido Berhoerster
<guido+opensuse.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to get away from this mailing list very soon. Too much pollution
for nothing.
If you are so worried what people want ask them! Shut down everything and
put
up vote what do you want. They'll tell you what they miss very loudy.
If mission not become number one GNU/Linux distro on earth i'm starting to
use Ubuntu or Fedora on our servers and development enviroment.
Don't mind developers they come when we have enough users. Money
will follow. Problem is why people use other distro than openSUSE not
why openSUSE exists. openSUSE is not for developers like open source
and free software ain't for developers. They are for users (that
is what everyone tends to forget).
I JUST ASK How much more documentation have other distros?
MSDN in documention way got it very right.
That should be the goal of documentation. what you don't
find there it doesn't exists.
Tuukka
ps. Please form another mailing list for discussion like this.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<guido+opensuse.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Martin Schlander <martin.schlander@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-06-21 20:00]:
I see a LOT of similarities with the Derivatives strategy.
Me too :-)
And I believe that any strategy will fail unless it has at its core to
make
openSUSE an attractive main OS in itself.
People will tend to choose their own preferred distro for their
derivatives
and their contributions. So the strategy should be to make people use
openSUSE
as their preferred OS - then the other things would follow
"automatically".
Exactly. And openSUSE currently already provides an
infrastructure with the Build Service and Studio which makes it
very easy to create derivatives. So why adopt a strategy which
focuses on one single aspect (which is already a strength) at the
expense of others (in this case a focus end-users)?
--
Guido Berhoerster
Hi,
I'm going to get away from this mailing list very soon. Too much pollution
for nothing.
If you are so worried what people want ask them! Shut down everything and
put
up vote what do you want. They'll tell you what they miss very loudy.
If mission not become number one GNU/Linux distro on earth i'm starting to
use Ubuntu or Fedora on our servers and development enviroment.
Don't mind developers they come when we have enough users. Money
will follow. Problem is why people use other distro than openSUSE not
why openSUSE exists. openSUSE is not for developers like open source
and free software ain't for developers. They are for users (that
is what everyone tends to forget).
I JUST ASK How much more documentation have other distros?
MSDN in documention way got it very right.
That should be the goal of documentation. what you don't
find there it doesn't exists.
Tuukka
ps. Please form another mailing list for discussion like this.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |