Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (930 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-project] openSUSE Strategy Discussion - Introduction
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:30:05 +0200
- Message-id: <201006171130.07291.aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
As announced previously, the openSUSE Board and its Strategy Team have worked
on three strategic proposals to define the direction of openSUSE’s future, as
a Project, Community and distribution. Each strategy proposal includes the
same community statement. We will therefore discuss the community statement
and the three strategies separately.
Focused Discussion
To have a focused discussion, we like to handle the discussion as follows on
both opensuse-project mailing list and the openSUSE forums:
1. Present today all three strategy proposals and the community statement,
they are available on the wiki - http://en.opensuse.org/Documents/Strategy
2. We will start discussing the community statement now in its own thread.
3. Monday, June, 21st: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Home for developers“.
4. Thursday, June, 24th: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Base for derivatives“.
5. Tuesday, June, 29th: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Mobile and cloud ready distribution“.
What do we want to achieve with these discussions?
* Refine the proposals, e.g. remove or add activities
* Discuss what needs to be done for each strategy proposal
* Figure out which strategy proposal is best, so pros and cons of each
ones.
Note that each statement contains three lists of activities describing current
activities the openSUSE Project does and possible future activities (or
tasks). The first list (“We need to be excellent in the following”) describes
the items that we want to do really excellent and better than everybody else.
The second list (“We will try to do the following effectively”) are needed to
do but we don’t need to strive for excellence, just for effectiveness. The
third list (“We will not focus on the following anymore”) are activities we
will not do at all as part of the project but rather rely on other FOSS
projects.
In the end, we’d like to have a vote by the openSUSE members on which strategy
to choose.
Pavol Rusnak and Andreas Jaeger will consolidate comments and proposal changes
for these in the openSUSE wiki.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
on three strategic proposals to define the direction of openSUSE’s future, as
a Project, Community and distribution. Each strategy proposal includes the
same community statement. We will therefore discuss the community statement
and the three strategies separately.
Focused Discussion
To have a focused discussion, we like to handle the discussion as follows on
both opensuse-project mailing list and the openSUSE forums:
1. Present today all three strategy proposals and the community statement,
they are available on the wiki - http://en.opensuse.org/Documents/Strategy
2. We will start discussing the community statement now in its own thread.
3. Monday, June, 21st: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Home for developers“.
4. Thursday, June, 24th: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Base for derivatives“.
5. Tuesday, June, 29th: We start a new thread to discuss the strategy
proposal “openSUSE – Mobile and cloud ready distribution“.
What do we want to achieve with these discussions?
* Refine the proposals, e.g. remove or add activities
* Discuss what needs to be done for each strategy proposal
* Figure out which strategy proposal is best, so pros and cons of each
ones.
Note that each statement contains three lists of activities describing current
activities the openSUSE Project does and possible future activities (or
tasks). The first list (“We need to be excellent in the following”) describes
the items that we want to do really excellent and better than everybody else.
The second list (“We will try to do the following effectively”) are needed to
do but we don’t need to strive for excellence, just for effectiveness. The
third list (“We will not focus on the following anymore”) are activities we
will not do at all as part of the project but rather rely on other FOSS
projects.
In the end, we’d like to have a vote by the openSUSE members on which strategy
to choose.
Pavol Rusnak and Andreas Jaeger will consolidate comments and proposal changes
for these in the openSUSE wiki.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |