Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (94 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Strategy Discussion
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 22:13:38 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005222157120.17876@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Like everyone else in the industry Novell has it's own mission and
vision, and supporting various platforms (including Windows) is part
of that. Also not every solution equally makes sense on every platform,
technically or commercially. It's not as if Novell hadn't invested a
lot, and I mean a lot, of money into Linux so far. ;-)
And for a mature openSUSE project, Novell's intentions actually should not
matter. This is like a lot of other projects where it's the contribution
that counts, and not the reasons (business, philantropy,...) in the end.
I do not see Mono and openSUSE linked in any specific way. If openSUSE
decides it wants to leverage Mono, fine. If not, fine too. Same if you
replace openSUSE by Fedora or Debian or Mandriva or FreeBSD,...
This has been one of our worst weaknesses and I was really happy to see
how this improved nicely with some of the milestone releases.
Gerald
--
Dr. Gerald Pfeifer gp@xxxxxxxxxx | SUSE Linux Products GmbH
Director Product Management | HRB 16746 (AG Nuremberg)
SUSE Linux Enterprise, openSUSE, Appliances | GF Markus Rex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
W: Novell is not seen - like Red Hat - as Open Source friend `-> this is
definitely true. Maybe Novell could act as Sponsor for more oS events.
But first of all, Novell should communicate their aims clearly (besides
'We support Linux, as long we are making money from it', which is what a
large part of the community thinks). Besides that, recently announced
Novell products like 'ZENworks Application Virtualization' are only
available for Windows and there are no clear statements if there will be
a Linux version available, ever (which Red Hat clearly communicated to
their community/customers with their latest virtualization product RHEV,
where all components will be available for Linux, too.)
Like everyone else in the industry Novell has it's own mission and
vision, and supporting various platforms (including Windows) is part
of that. Also not every solution equally makes sense on every platform,
technically or commercially. It's not as if Novell hadn't invested a
lot, and I mean a lot, of money into Linux so far. ;-)
And for a mature openSUSE project, Novell's intentions actually should not
matter. This is like a lot of other projects where it's the contribution
that counts, and not the reasons (business, philantropy,...) in the end.
S: decent .net support with mono (?)
`-> this is only visible for a real small part of the community. Most
of them does not really accept the joint-venture with M$ (which has
not been communicated very well in the past) and see not benefits in
Mono. We have to point out the real advantages of interoperability,
here.
I do not see Mono and openSUSE linked in any specific way. If openSUSE
decides it wants to leverage Mono, fine. If not, fine too. Same if you
replace openSUSE by Fedora or Debian or Mandriva or FreeBSD,...
W: lots of cool features are not documented, thus not used or integrated
This has been one of our worst weaknesses and I was really happy to see
how this improved nicely with some of the milestone releases.
Gerald
--
Dr. Gerald Pfeifer gp@xxxxxxxxxx | SUSE Linux Products GmbH
Director Product Management | HRB 16746 (AG Nuremberg)
SUSE Linux Enterprise, openSUSE, Appliances | GF Markus Rex
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |