Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (145 mails)

[jperlow@xxxxxxxxx]

I will add however that there does seem to be a large amount of commercial 
appliances using centos. Had an opensles been avaliable three or four years 
ago, would the situation be different today?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: jperlow@xxxxxxxxx

Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:49:32 
To: Graham Anderson<graham.anderson@xxxxxxxxx>; <opensuse-project@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Long Term Support...


Susestudio is indeed nice, but for compaines that want to host their own build 
environments a self hosting distro based on sles would be nice as well.

I am acutually using suse studio myself, its a nice site.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Anderson <graham.anderson@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:26:05 
To: <opensuse-project@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Long Term Support...


On Tuesday 15 September 2009 22:07:34 Jason Perlow wrote:
> That SUSE seems to have ceded the market for appliance
> server OS to Redhat/CentOS where an "OpenSLES" could provide some
> differentiation and superiority in the build system and various other
> aspects may be something that has been overlooked.

You do know that you can create a custom appliance OS from a choice of 
openSUSE 11.1, SLED 10 or 11 and also SLES 10 or 11 using the rather groovy 
susestudio.com?

As far as I'm aware there's a Novell support channel available for those 
organisations that need it.

Given that *nobody* else in the appliance server sphere has_anything_ like 
susestudio.com I'd hardly say this is a case of ceding the market ;)

Cheers the noo
Graham

-- 
“Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes.”
 ☘ Oscar Wilde
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx