Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (145 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: Voting for name for openSLES/openSUSE LTS wasRe: [opensuse-project] I will use the CIVS service for the choosing of the name.
  • From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:18:12 +0200
  • Message-id: <200909081818.12547.aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Besides the question what would it mean for Novell which is hard to answer as
Zonker hinted -, I think we should also discuss what this means for the
openSUSE project.

Here're the questions that are in my mind about this:

There were three topics mentioned and I'm asking myself what a successful
"openSUSE Server Media", "openSUSE LTS" or "openSLES" would mean for the
openSUSE project itself. So, in total we have at least three different angels
to look at this: From Novell's perspective, from the openSUSE project
perspective - and from the perspective of server admins.

All three projects would require volunteers to step up and those volunteers
would be missed in other parts of the project. So, could either of these
attract additional volunteers to the openSUSE project and additional users to
openSUSE?

openSUSE Server Media:
* This would be packages that are part of the distribution, so work for it
would go back to the distribution itself and strengthen it. It would make
openSUSE as a server more popular (openSUSE is already used as a server).

openSUSE LTS:
* If this would be done every couple of releases, I expect that the LTS team
would help to harden this release and this would benefit everybody.
* If the team uses technology from openSUSE, like the Build Service, the
engineers might improve this technology and therefore improve the tools.
* Indirectly, this might give openSLES/openSUSE LTS additional users that then
become SLES or openSUSE users later - or work in the Build Service with
benefits for openSUSE.

openSLES
* I see no direct benefit from the packaging work for this to openSUSE
distribution itself.
* If the team uses technology from openSUSE, like the Build Service, the
engineers might improve this technology and therefore improve the tools.
* Indirectly, this might give openSLES/openSUSE LTS additional users that then
become SLES or openSUSE users later - or work in the Build Service with
benefits for openSUSE.

Did I miss anything or where is my thinking flawed?

Even if I'm not convinced yet that some options are the best for the openSUSE
project, it doesn't mean I will block anything (I doubt I could;), it just
implies where I engage myself,

Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
< Previous Next >