Hm - that came out a bit harsher than I wanted. I do understand that no harm was meant by those who proposed to default openSUSE to KDE. Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:59 +0200 schrieb Christian Jäger:
The difference is, KDE users felt unfairly treated by what was a corporate decision. We all suffered from such situations; need I mention the acronym ZMD? I still think it is a lot easier to feel ill-treated by faceless, corporate governance than by your own 'community', your own openSUSE-'comrades'. People you thought of as having the same interest as you - until they turned round and kicked you, thus obviously redefining the community to which they feel loyal to; redefining it as a smaller circle (openSUSE minus GNOME).
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 14:00 +0200 schrieb Martin Schlander:
Torsdag den 27. august 2009 13:42:36 skrev Michael Meeks:
Thank you for you mail; it was exactly what I was looking for, and most helpfully re-assuring. It is indeed sad that re-assurance is necessary I suppose
Maybe now you guys understand why KDE users needed some reassurance after the long list of events in recent years which had left the vast majority of our community not feeling assured _at_all_.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org