-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, 2009-04-02 at 10:01 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM -0700, PGNet wrote:
over on the opensuse user list, there's, imho, a refreshingly thoughtful, well-written commentary posted by Jim Henderson,
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2009-04/msg00002.html
he's done a good job of expressing thoughts & frustrations that, i'd suggest, more than a few of us (community & commercial users alike) experience in the project.
Maybe, but his post is based in the assumption that we do only security updates for 11.0. This is simply untrue, if an update
Well, he says that probably because I told him it was so (look up the thread) O:-) Has the old SUSE policy of only security patches changed, then?
goes out to 11.0 or not is decided on a case by case basis. Plus, if the same update also goes to 11.1 chances are very high that it also is released for 11.0. The work is already done anyway.
I thought that when this happened it was simply an exception because the bug was huge or caused an uproar, not a matter of policy. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknUuR0ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WmEACgmL+Pwg9Q474Uu03q3wx6aWT2 qmMAnjN557U4R7DCEUJ4L+YH4Pox2DIy =F5eO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org