Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (328 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] Boxed editions slipping on release dates (3 weeks in some cases)
- From: "Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:30:45 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0812240224090.7430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 2008-12-23 at 19:05 -0600, Bryen wrote:
Dunno.
The labeling would be very important.
Those chaps would know how to know :-)
Yep, perhaps.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklRkMwACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Vt1QCgiivHU2Ks1g39usmM55brXZmQ
dosAn2PW3PDO/fug+mDo08ffaIQDXLWH
=93ih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 2008-12-23 at 19:05 -0600, Bryen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 01:04 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
I think it would be better to delay the box and add the first month or
two of patches. They usually are a lot patches, and some of the bugs
discovered and solved in the first month or two after release are
important.
It does add value to the box, for sure. But how would we ensure
consumers know this is the "Less-bug" version?
Dunno.
The labeling would be very important.
And would there be
confusion if a consumer also happens to have the downloaded version from
previously?
Those chaps would know how to know :-)
Would we call all such boxed releases 11.1.1 and so on?
Yep, perhaps.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklRkMwACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Vt1QCgiivHU2Ks1g39usmM55brXZmQ
dosAn2PW3PDO/fug+mDo08ffaIQDXLWH
=93ih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |