* Cornelius Schumacher
If you restrict the term to one term the problem is indeed reduced, but I think the question of reelectibility of board members should be independent of the question who is granting member status. There are good reasons why it would be good to have board members serve for more terms, e.g. to provide continuity, so restricting the options for that because of unrelated topics wouldn't be a wise solution.
for a five member board, have one three year term and four two year terms with the two year terms occuring on alternating years, with the possibility of one of the two year electees being ?promoted? to fill the third year of the three year term in special circumstances. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org