Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (169 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] SDB/Howto/FAQ
- From: "Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:44:07 -0500
- Message-id: <200710171244.07393.rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 11:41:05 am Josef Assad wrote:
> I looked at the separation from the perspective of someone who has
> something to write up on the wiki and is trying to figure out where it
> goes. Following your separation definition, I would suggest this as a
> more concise way to tell if it is SDB or HOWTO:
>
> - If it is reactive (i.e. there was a problem de facto, this is how I
> solved it) then that's an SDB
> - If it is proactive (my box is fine, but I'd like to figure out how to
> do this or that) then this would be HOWTO
Hi Asad,
I vote for your definition.
That is what SDB was for me, a solution for existing problem:
- summary of bug fix in bugzilla, and link where to pick up patch, or
- workaround until bug is fixed
- small fixes of default configuration which is not a bug, but needed to run
some application
Though, IMHO SDB should not be edited at will.
It has to be dependable source of information, it should be protected.
Everyone has enough space on wiki to write articles, and when they are good
quality and fit in the SDB concept, than it is easy to include them in SDB.
--
Regards,
Rajko.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> I looked at the separation from the perspective of someone who has
> something to write up on the wiki and is trying to figure out where it
> goes. Following your separation definition, I would suggest this as a
> more concise way to tell if it is SDB or HOWTO:
>
> - If it is reactive (i.e. there was a problem de facto, this is how I
> solved it) then that's an SDB
> - If it is proactive (my box is fine, but I'd like to figure out how to
> do this or that) then this would be HOWTO
Hi Asad,
I vote for your definition.
That is what SDB was for me, a solution for existing problem:
- summary of bug fix in bugzilla, and link where to pick up patch, or
- workaround until bug is fixed
- small fixes of default configuration which is not a bug, but needed to run
some application
Though, IMHO SDB should not be edited at will.
It has to be dependable source of information, it should be protected.
Everyone has enough space on wiki to write articles, and when they are good
quality and fit in the SDB concept, than it is easy to include them in SDB.
--
Regards,
Rajko.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |