Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (67 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Guiding Principles - 2nd draft
- From: Robert Schiele <rschiele@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:08:35 +0200
- Message-id: <20070713030834.GC18966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:19:55PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
If you need to do a significant amount of your decisions in such a project
based on voting instead of getting consensus without voting then your project
is practically dead anyway. Thus I don't understand why this is such an
issue.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Public votes have the advantage that you know who you need to call
names, but they also have the disadvantage that everybody will call a
specific board member names in case of problematic decisions...
I'm not sure what is better here. (In other words: I prefer public votes
unless I'm elected as a board member ;-))
Opinions?
BTW: How do the boards of other open source projects handle this?
If you need to do a significant amount of your decisions in such a project
based on voting instead of getting consensus without voting then your project
is practically dead anyway. Thus I don't understand why this is such an
issue.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxx
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
| < Previous | Next > |