Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (265 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Guiding Principles
- From: Cornelius Schumacher <cschum@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:42:00 +0200
- Message-id: <200705250042.00995.cschum@xxxxxxx>
On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:45, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Martin Schlander wrote:
> ...
>
> > Also I think some of the goals can be seen as contradictory - making an
> > OS that's great for devs and grandmothers at the same time might prove
> > difficult. Maybe we could balance it more by saying something like "we
> > want to create a powerful, full featured OS, while making it fairly easy
> > to use".
>
> I definitely second that.
> Saying that we want to do the best for everyone in every situation
> (almost, didn't mention embedded systems ;)) is also quite vague in
> terms of mission statement, directions or priorities.
>
> I don't have a better proposal atm (Martin's suits me quite well), but
> we should think of a _somewhat_ narrowed scope.
> SUSE is most probably the best allround distribution around right now,
> and it _is_ good at desktop and server. But still, aiming for all goals
> is difficult... and vague.
You are right, that aiming for all possible goals is vague. But isn't being an
allround distro a pretty specific goal? My feeling is that this is a big part
of the SUSE identity. We always tried to address a very broad range of users.
In some way this is trying to reach the impossible, but that's not the worst
for a mission statement. Let's leave the realistic goals to the intermediate
steps to world domination ;-)
Maybe we can find a better way to say this, which doesn't sound so vague.
--
Cornelius Schumacher <cschum@xxxxxxx>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Martin Schlander wrote:
> ...
>
> > Also I think some of the goals can be seen as contradictory - making an
> > OS that's great for devs and grandmothers at the same time might prove
> > difficult. Maybe we could balance it more by saying something like "we
> > want to create a powerful, full featured OS, while making it fairly easy
> > to use".
>
> I definitely second that.
> Saying that we want to do the best for everyone in every situation
> (almost, didn't mention embedded systems ;)) is also quite vague in
> terms of mission statement, directions or priorities.
>
> I don't have a better proposal atm (Martin's suits me quite well), but
> we should think of a _somewhat_ narrowed scope.
> SUSE is most probably the best allround distribution around right now,
> and it _is_ good at desktop and server. But still, aiming for all goals
> is difficult... and vague.
You are right, that aiming for all possible goals is vague. But isn't being an
allround distro a pretty specific goal? My feeling is that this is a big part
of the SUSE identity. We always tried to address a very broad range of users.
In some way this is trying to reach the impossible, but that's not the worst
for a mission statement. Let's leave the realistic goals to the intermediate
steps to world domination ;-)
Maybe we can find a better way to say this, which doesn't sound so vague.
--
Cornelius Schumacher <cschum@xxxxxxx>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |